By Michael Kirkwood, Philip Hanson
Read or Download Alexander Zinoviev as Writer and Thinker: An Assessment PDF
Similar criticism & theory books
During this groundbreaking paintings of revisionary literary heritage, Marilyn Butler lines the imagining of other models of the kingdom in eighteenth-century Britain, either within the works of a chain of recognized poets (Akenside, Thomson, grey, Collins, Chatterton, Macpherson, Blake) and within the differing money owed of the nationwide tradition provided by means of eighteenth-century antiquarians and literary historians.
Georgie Hyde Lees, who married W. B. Yeats within the autumn of 1917, has for a few years occupied a secondary or perhaps marginal place in so much reviews of her well-known husband. She has been depicted as a bad selection for romantic companion, political comrade, or literary collaborator. whereas frequently thanked in acknowledgments pages and considered as a minor editor or secretary, she often gets in basic terms footnote prestige in literary analyses.
- The Cambridge Introduction to Postcolonial Literatures in English (Cambridge Introductions to Literature)
- Literary Circles And Gender in Early Modern Europe: A Cross-cultural Approach (Women and Gender in the Early Modern World) (Women and Gender in the Early Modern World)
- Althusser: A Critical Reader (Blackwell Critical Readers)
- Novels for Students: Presenting Analysis, Context and Criticism on Commonly Studied Novels Volume 4
- Surveyors of Customs: American Literature as Cultural Analysis
Additional info for Alexander Zinoviev as Writer and Thinker: An Assessment
MIZ, p. 147. 85. , p. 34. 86. , p. 36. 87. , p. 37. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. Arch Tait 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. , p. 36. BI, p. 76. NSNRNB, p. 54. Ibid. NSNRNB, p. 55. Zinoviev wrote in May 1980, 'Each day of this year comes and goes like a personal insult. You feel submerged up to your chin in a boundless ocean of dirty water. You feel as if your body and soul were already being consumed by the bacteria of decay and the maggots, and yet still you clutch at moral precepts which have lost their force - the last remaining straw.
An example is no doubt Ibansk itself which, Zinoviev suggests, he chose 'as a means of presenting the results of my researches into Soviet society as having some measure of relevance for any contemporary human collective of sufficient size and development'. 65 Zinoviev tells us that he has observed rigorous scientific standards, and has arrived at certain conclusions. His creative fantasy is not, therefore, unfettered. He describes his method as 'the scientific style of figurative thinking' (nauchnyi stil' obraznogo myshleniya').
Therefore the Soviet 'leaders' were not leaders at all but preventers of consistent, purposive action by human beings: 17 in the last resort a sort of negating mafia, bereft of religion, philosophy, logic and law, acting against good and against God. Zinoviev himself has never explicitly rejected Sovietism which he 20 Experiences of a Soviet Methodologist accepts de facto as a valid, working system. On the other hand, he idolises neither Lenin nor Glorious October. He believes that his country had, in the historical sense, very bad luck to be saddled with Lenin and his 'old guard'; especially the latter who, for Zinoviev, were mainly 'chatter-boxes' like Trotsky or softies like Bukharin.